Jump to Navigation

New York Personal Injury Blog

Welcome To Our Blog

If you or someone you love has been injured due to the negligence of another person or organization, it is important to know your legal rights. Keeping current on relevant legislation and court decisions involving personal injury and medical malpractice claims is an important part of recognizing and asserting your rights.

At Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., we have dedicated our careers to helping people throughout New York with issues ranging from car accidents and workplace accidents to birth injuries and surgical errors. We have created this Blog for the purpose of informing injury victims on new developments in legal areas that affect them.

We also hope this Blog allows us to learn more about your concerns. We invite you to share your opinions, worries and questions about the topics we discuss on these pages.

Thank you for taking the time to visit us today, and please check back for regular updates. Contact us today online or by telephone at 888-4-TGLAW to discuss your specific legal problem.

The Right to Privacy - For Patients and Doctors

  • 21
  • July
    2010
The physician-patient privilege is something we take for granted.  We expect that when we go to the doctor we can be totally open and honest and share our personal details secure in the knowledge that the physician has a duty to keep that information to him or herself.  The privilege exists both to enable us, as patients, to feel free to share all details with our doctor, no matter how embarrassing or how reluctant we might be to divulge such personal information.  This is because we know it won't go any further than the doctor's office.  The privilege also serves to allow doctors to probe into personal matters and expect honest and forthright answers because the patient knows that whatever is said in the doctor's office stays in the doctor's office.

New York's highest Court, the Court of Appeals, has determined that when someone brings a lawsuit, they no longer have the same expectation of privacy and privilege as does anyone else.  To be sure, a plaintiff in a lawsuit has always had to provide all medical records related to the injury (and the parts of the body that have been injured).  But in 2007, the Court of Appeals went further.  In Arons v. Jutkowitz, 9 N.Y.3d 393, 850 N.Y.S.2d 345 (2007), the Court held that a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit has to give permission to the defendant to speak to his own physician.  As a result, a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit now has to allow defense attorneys to meet with his or her own physician, and there isn't even a requirement that the plaintiff must be present. Just think about it for a minute: if you were hurt through someone else's fault and bring suit, you have to give the attorney for those that caused you to be injured permission to meet with your doctor, without your even being there to hear what they discuss.
 
In response to this decision, a bill was introduced to reinstate the traditional physician-patient privilege for those who have been hurt and seek recovery.  "Who could be opposed to such a bill" you might ask.  In this instance the answer is surprising.  A group that purports to represent health care providers has opposed the bill.  It seems that because sometimes health care providers are sued, at least one group supposedly representing such providers has determined that potentially protecting their own interests outweighs the important principles that led to the widespread application of the physician-patient privilege in the first place.

That group, the Greater New York Hospital Association recently took out a full page advertisement in the New York Times taking aim at the bill that would reinstate the privilege. Brian Conway, a spokesman for the group said : "This egregious bill is nothing more than a gift to trial lawyers that will send already outrageously high medical malpractice premiums for hospitals and doctors through the roof."  In response, the bill's sponsor, Assemblyman Rory Lancman, said "Nonsense. It's a protection of patient's rights. When you go to your doctor, you have an expectation that your communications with your doctor are going to be private and confidential."  Assemblyman Lancman then added "What they can't do is meet with your doctor, privately, outside the scope of the rules and procedures that are currently in place to make sure that their conversations are limited to the injury in question." This bill would limit attempts by health care providers who undermine the doctor patient relationship while also protecting the confidentiality of patients.

Not only is this bill important to our clients and society as a whole, but we think it would actually serve to ease some of the pressure and stress on doctors who may be involved in litigation cases.  We think this bill is an important one and it is a shame that some of those who would benefit from it don't even realize it.

Tort Law - A Shield for the Public, Not an Achilles' Heal

  • 02
  • July
    2010

A recent article in the New York Post titled 'Tort threat' is a tri-state jobs-killerprovides the insurance industry's take on tort law in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.  Once again, the New York Post has turned its opinion page over to a mouthpiece for big business and the insurance industry in an attempt to sway people's view against a right of recovery for those who have been injured.  In contrast to the New York Post, we think the right to make a claim for personal injury is one that needs to be protected rather than diminished.  The notion that so-called "tort reform" should be implemented as a means of economic stimulus is just plain silly.  No economist (unless big business and the insurance industry have managed to place one on their payroll) has ever suggested that such a plan makes economic sense.  But that won't stop insurance and big business from making the argument.  Shame on the New York Post, however, for publishing such propaganda.  Reducing the amount of money a plaintiff can be awarded  in order to create jobs or reduce taxes does not make economic sense.  Rather, such a concept simply shifts the burden and hardship for paying for this economic reshuffling, placing it squarely on the shoulders of those who have already been injured.  Where is the justice in that?  Furthermore, doing so would deprive an injured person of the opportunity to present his or her case to a jury of peers.  Our judicial system relies on people to come to a decision together and make a just determination.  Apparently, the New York Post believes that although our citizens are smart enough to decide life and death matters in criminal cases (literally), they are not smart enough to do so in civil cases.  We disagree; We believe that juries are more than able to decide cases.  Moreover, what the article fails to mention is that every case is already potentially subject to at least two layers of review.  Both the trial judge, and then an appellate panel of judges (if an appeal is taken) review a jury's determination both to see if it was supported by the evidence and to ensure that the award does not deviate from what has previously been awarded for similar injuries.  Such double layered review already ensures that so-called "frivolous" cases do not result in awards.  On the other hand, the article's proposal would do nothing more than shield people who hurt others from the consequences of their own negligence.  While big business and the insurance industry would certainly benefit from such mislabeled "reform," injured people -- and society as a whole -- would pay the price.  We firmly believe that all of us should continue to be responsible for our own actions.  Pieces like this are written for the purpose of keeping us -- trial lawyers -- from helping people who have been injured by outside forces that they cannot control.  Don't fall for it.

NYC Landlord Fined For Failing To Disclose Lead Paint

  • 02
  • July
    2010

Finding a safe home or apartment to rent in New York City can be a daunting task. Renters face a myriad of hoops from finding a safe and secure building to access to transportation to affordability and amenities. One safety issue that the EPA is trying to clean up is that of lead paint within rental units and buildings.

Lead, whether in dust, soil or paint, is still the main environmental hazard for children in the United States despite its precipitous decline over the last two decades. Even at low levels, the metal can cause terrible neurological damage in young children, including a lowered I.Q., memory loss, hearing loss, kidney failure, increased aggression, and chronic muscle pain. Many children never fully recover after being poisoned and continue to exhibit symptoms throughout their life. Lead can also cause serious conditions in adults.

EPA Enforcing New Rules On Presence of Lead in Rental Units

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is strictly enforcing the new federal rules that went into effect in April 2010, which strictly regulate lead paint in rental units and require that a landlord disclose the use of lead paint in any rental constructed before 1978. Landlords must be sure that their rentals fully comply with lead-based paint requirements, or they will face significant fines.

A good example of the EPA's enforcement efforts on lead paint is the case of Wolfe Landau, a Brooklyn landlord. Landau has agreed to pay a $20,000 civil penalty for violating the new lead-based paint disclosure rules.

Buoyed by the new rules, the Center for Disease Control hopes to fully eliminate childhood lead poisoning in 2010. In 2006, an estimated 120,000 children had elevated lead levels nationwide - down from 890,000 in 1994. However, in a study published in 2009, nearly 60 percent of tenants in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bushwick reported that their landlords had not complied with any of the proposed regulations. The CDC and EPA are looking to change that and have issued an enforcement alert to more than 235,000 contractors nationwide.

Contractors must distribute the EPA's pamphlet on lead safety before beginning any renovations on homes or apartments built before 1978, and must attain certification from the EPA in lead safety. Contractors must contain the work area; cover floors, furniture, heating or cooling vents; minimize dust; and clean up thoroughly.

What To Do If Your Home Violates Federal, State, or New York City Laws on Lead?

In New York City, laws also seek to mandate compliance for abatement of lead in multiple dwelling residences. The City has long been aware of the lead problem and advocates, including personal injury trial lawyers have pressed hard for tough laws to "get the lead out."

If you have reason to believe that a landlord or contractor working in your home or apartment is not complying with the new regulations, ask to see the contractor's lead safety certification, contact your local health department and a tenant's rights attorney, and call the EPA's hotline at 800-424-LEAD (5323).

FDA Monitoring Infusion Pump Issues

  • 03
  • June
    2010

Thanks to new guidelines soon to be implemented by the FDA, medical device-makers will need to provide detailed information and statistics as to why their devices should receive approval. The first device to face tighter scrutiny? The infusion pump. A common hospital and home device for automatically delivering drugs and food to patients intravenously, the infusion pump has recently come under great criticism.

One sticking point many FDA doctors had was the sheer number of complaints. Since 2005, more than 10,000 infusion pump-related complaints have been received each year, along with reports of 710 deaths, or roughly 142 deaths every year. FDA officials feel the actual number of deaths could be significantly higher. Also coming to a head were many FDA scientists, who had complained that their criticisms of certain devices had fallen on deaf ears. For many years, devices such as the infusion pump were allowed to skirt standard testing and clinical trials based on the manufacturer's assurance that a new device was similar to an older, already-approved device.

So, what is the problem with infusion pumps? There are two main areas, experts say, where problems can occur. The first is user error. This often happens with the home patient or hospital nurse inputting the wrong amount of medication. Device error can also happen, when the internal software inadvertently overdoses the patient. A combination of the two is what FDA officials believe could be the most common culprit, an event they call "key bounce." In this instance, the device interprets a single keystroke as two, so a nurse or patient requesting one unit of medication would instead receive 11 units.

The new crackdown on infusion pumps could be just the beginning for the FDA. Long considered a simple rubber stamp for new products, the Obama Administration has promised to pump new life into the FDA as a regulator. The initial outcome could be a slower approval process, but ultimately the hope is for safer drugs, more reliable medical equipment, and ultimately, healthier patients.

Recent Death of Brooklyn Cyclist is Reminder for Bike Safety

  • 02
  • June
    2010

This time of year is a great time for commuting and bike rides. But as urban dwellers know, riding a bicycle in the City can be dangerous. No better example of this came than two incidents during the middle of April. Over a 24-hour stretch, two New York City bicyclists were hit by cars, one of them fatally.

Both accidents happened either in the dead of night or as daylight was breaking. Whether the lighting conditions had anything to do with either accident is unclear, but the accidents emphasize the need for bike safety.

If you are willing to take the chance and ride a bike in busy traffic or late at night as summer approaches, be sure to keep these safety tips in mind:

1. Get a headlight. In most states, this is the law when riding at night, but even in the daytime, it's a good idea to use a bright, even flashing, headlight.

2. Get a horn. For the same reason you need a headlight so cars can see you, you need a horn so they can hear you.

3. Get a mirror. On a busy road, you might not hear everything around you. A mirror mounted to your handle bars can alert you to an encroaching vehicle.

4. Share the road. A bicyclist has to follow all the rules cars do (stopping at stop signs, signaling while turning), so sharing the road is the safest way to travel. This is especially true while stopped. Never stop beside or slightly behind a car, where you might not be seen, especially if you're in their blind spot.

5. Use your head. It is generally safer for bicyclists to take less-traveled roads and roads marked with bike lanes. If you think you might be in danger, bail out. Don't be afraid to jump onto the curb or out of the way. Just because you might be in the right in a certain situation doesn't mean you need to prove it. Always be safe.

Along with these tips, there are rules bicyclists must follow at all times. These will differ by municipality, but as a case in point, a glance at the New York City Bicycle Rules and Regulations is informative. There you'll find that, like motorists, bicyclists are expected to obey all traffic signals, signs and lane markings. Unlike motorists, bicyclists are restricted to surface roads, as "expressways, drives, highways, interstate routes, bridges and thruways, unless authorized by signs," are all forbidden.

While you are allowed to use the roads, if there is a bicycle path available, you must use it. You must also use hand signals for turning, have a white headlight and red taillight, as well as a bell or other audible signal. There are more rules, of course, so check local guidelines for the ones you're expected to follow.

Contact

777 Third Avenue, 35th Floor | New York, NY 10017 | Phone: 212-750-1200 | Toll Free: 888-4-TGLLAW (888-484-5529) | Fax: 212-980-4011 | Email | Directions